Public technology and shared capability
Technical services, human oversight, and the practical value of shared public infrastructure.
This is a working framework. Some ideas and implementation details are still being developed.
Working proposal. This is a working proposal, not an adopted policy.
Develop civic intelligence and resilience monitoring
Earlier understanding of shared-system risks can inform preparedness.
A State Civic Intelligence and Resilience Service could monitor food, water, energy, housing, transportation, public health, workforce needs, and supply chains; identify risks; test scenarios; and publish assumptions and uncertainty.
Institutions, data access, privacy, funding and responsibility for acting on forecasts remain to be designed.
Read this alongside The Framework and the Working Guide.
← Back to this idea in the mapWorking proposal. This is a working proposal, not an adopted policy.
Create a public outcomes observatory
Comparable outcomes can help residents evaluate public services.
A Public Outcomes Observatory could compare cost of living, housing availability, learning outcomes, economic activity, public safety, infrastructure, environmental quality, health, fiscal condition, processing times, and citizen satisfaction. Measurement should inform citizens without ideological ratings or personal social scoring.
Definitions, comparability, uncertainty, independent review and corrections require design before comparisons are treated as reliable.
Read this alongside The Framework and the Working Guide.
← Back to this idea in the mapWorking proposal. This is a working proposal, not an adopted policy.
Offer a source-citing civic assistant
Government information should be easier to navigate without giving an assistant sovereign powers.
An optional civic assistant could help individuals understand laws, taxes, budgets, benefits, permits, education and healthcare options, business requirements, appeals, and public participation. It should cite sources, acknowledge uncertainty, and provide access to a human. It would have no independent authority to punish, deny, investigate, or classify a person.
This optional service remains a working proposal, with operating arrangements, privacy, testing and funding unresolved.
Read this alongside The Framework and the Working Guide.
← Back to this idea in the mapWorking proposal. This is a working proposal, not an adopted policy.
Coordinate waste recovery and materials reuse
Shared recovery can connect materials with useful treatment and reuse.
How it would work. States could coordinate recycling, composting, hazardous waste, wastewater recovery, and reusable materials.
Implementation. Map material flows and test recovery technologies and shared facilities. Evaluate results without requiring each community to adopt an identical solution.
Read this alongside The Framework and the Working Guide.
← Back to this idea in the mapWorking proposal. This is a working proposal, not an adopted policy.
Offer skills and worker-transition support
People need practical ways to adapt as tools and work change.
How it would work. Skills and transition support could include training, apprenticeships, credentials, and access to tools.
Implementation. Define eligibility, providers, costs and outcomes before selecting programs. Training proposals do not establish a particular benefit or mandatory work test.
Read this alongside The Framework and the Working Guide.
← Back to this idea in the mapWorking proposal. This is a working proposal, not an adopted policy.
Make records and earned benefits portable between communities
Moving should not require rebuilding an administrative life.
Implementation. Maintain secure portability of records and earned benefits between communities.
Implementation. Preserve secure continuity for identity, education, credentials, pensions, courts, health, business, vehicle and property records when people move. Specify authorization, access and compatible systems.
Read this alongside The Framework and the Working Guide.
← Back to this idea in the mapWorking proposal. This is a working proposal, not an adopted policy.
Decide how verified automation gains benefit the public
Automation gains must be verified before promises are made about who benefits.
Measure net savings and productivity from public automation. Previously discussed uses include lower taxes or fees, debt reduction, better services, reserves, training, shorter public-sector workweeks without reduced service, and local productivity dividends. No fixed allocation or universal dividend has been adopted. These uses must be reconciled with individual direction of contributions and residual balances.
Read this alongside The Framework and the Working Guide.
← Back to this idea in the map